NewQODEX QA Services for API teams.Learn more →

Your pipeline is continuous. Testing should be too.

Continuous testing and security on every PR, runs on your real app, not guesswork.

G2 Best Software 2026, Fastest GrowingG2 award badgeG2 award badgeG2 award badge4.9 / 5 on G2 · loved by 10k+ teams
Start free

Playground

qodex · playground · staging
Agentcheckout-api
Sub-agent: explore checkout decline pathRunning
Phase 1 · reproduce the decline on the real checkout.
Opened /checkout
200 · cart has 2 items, total $48.00
Filled card 4000 0000 0000 0069
expiry 04/22 · cvc 123 · submitted
Phase 2 · assert the gateway refuses it cleanly.
POST /v1/payments -> 402
{ "error": "card_expired", "decline_code": "expired_card" }
Asserted decline copy "Your card has expired"
visible on #pay-error · charge refused
Phase 3 · confirm the cart survives a session token refresh.
POST /v1/auth/refresh -> 200
rotated session token · same cart id
GET /v1/cart -> 200
2 items preserved · verifying line totals
Thinking...
Exploring checkout endpoints0/12 mapped
ScenarioTS-042

Expired card is declined cleanly

POST /v1/payments · checkout-api
Severity
HIGH
State
ACTIVE
Last run
PASS
Steps
  1. 1.
    GIVEN
    A cart with two items at /checkout
    NAVIGATE /checkout · total $48.00
  2. 2.
    WHEN
    Pay with an expired card
    POST /v1/payments · card 4000…0069 · expect 402
  3. 3.
    THEN
    Decline copy shows and the charge is refused
    ASSERT text="Your card has expired"
  4. 4.
    AND
    Cart survives a session token refresh
    GET /v1/cart -> 200 · 2 items preserved
HIGHPASS
run_5f1c · 4/4 assertions · 1.2ssaved to suite (42)
trusted by teams shipping at AI speed
[ why now ]

PR volume is through the roof. Testing hasn't kept up.

LLMs reset what one engineer can ship. PRs pile up faster every week, and QA, code review, and stale test suites are left picking up the pieces.

~5x
longer PR review time under high AI adoption
3x+
increase in the incidents-to-PR ratio
+31%
more PRs merge without any review

Passing tests isn't the same as working software.

[ today's options ]

Two answers, neither one runs your code.

reads · never runs

PR reviewers that read the diff and guess.

They pattern-match the change and tell you what might be wrong. Confident, fast, and they never ran your code, so the verification that matters is still on you.

runs · never learns

Testing tools that run once and forget.

They execute, but off to the side, on a schedule, disconnected from the code. Each run is an island, the scenarios go stale, and the coverage map is theater.

what qodex does instead↻ continuous loop
01
Your test scenarios
One place, owned by the team.
02
Run on the real app
Every pull request and deploy.
03
Proof of what broke
Failing request, response, screenshot.
04
Scenarios stay current
Coverage compounds, never resets.
[ how it works ]

From scattered test knowledge to continuous testing.

The jobs Qodex takes off the team, end to end.

import scenarios
Import from a source
Pull in spreadsheets, OpenAPI specs, Postman collections, existing tests, and product docs, into one place to start from.
Google Sheets
connected
Postman
connected
OpenAPI spec
connected
Product docs
connect
importing · postman132 / 168
[ system of record ]

Out of people's heads, into one living record.

Test knowledge lives in senior engineers' heads, in spreadsheets that rot the moment code changes, and walks out the door when they do.

Qodex keeps your scenarios in one place, owned by the team and proven continuously: the authoritative picture of how your software should behave.

scattered today
Google Sheets
Slack threads
Postman
Senior engineers
Qodex
one living record
Scenarios
Test runs
Findings
PR comments
[ test scenarios ]

Automate the layer that governs your tests.

Your scenarios are the plain-language record of how the product should behave. Qodex keeps them accurate and runs them for you, so coverage moves at the speed you ship.

They don't belong in a spreadsheet. They belong where your code lives.

scenarios · 42
ScenarioSevStatus
Expired card is declined cleanlyHIGHPASS
Admin can't read another org's billingCRITFAIL
Invite link expires after seven daysMEDPASS
Checkout preserves cart after auth refreshHIGHPASS
Password reset rejects re-used tokensHIGHREVIEW
[ proof, not guesses ]

Not "this might break." This broke. Here's the proof.

When a PR opens, a CLI or local run fires, or you run it inside Qodex, your scenarios run against the real software and you get back what actually broke.

Qodex posts the result inline: the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. A human still decides what merges.

finding F-2048
OPENFIXEDFALSE+WON'T FIX

Admin can read another org's billing

Reproduction
Sign in as Org A admin
GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing
Expect 403 Forbidden
Screenshot
Billing · Org #8842
MRR $41,200
Rendered for an org the user does not belong to.
pull/1473 · run_5f1c · detected 0.8s into run
[ for your team ]

Built for the people who own quality.

Know whether this PR actually broke a scenario before you merge.

A real run on the diff, with the failing request and response inline in review. No more reading the change and hoping.

github.com/acme/checkout · pull/1473
#1473harden tenant billing access
fix/tenant-billing-isolation → main
Qodex · continuous testing1 failed of 41
Qodex bot commented

Scenario "Admin can't read another org's billing" failed: GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing returned 200, expected 403.

Caught before merge · request, response & screenshot attached
Request
GET /v1/orgs/org_8842/billing
Authorization: Bearer <org_A_admin>
Response · 200 OK
{
  "org_id": "org_8842",
  "plan": "scale",
  "mrr": 41200
}
run_5f1c · main @ 9a2e1b · 0.8s
[ proof in the field ]

"We’re no longer chasing outdated test scripts after every new release."

Navjot Bedi · Workday

"We achieved 100% API test coverage without hiring a huge QA team."

Anurag Gupta · ComeUp

"Our shipment time from staging to production reduced to 2 days instead of 5."

Brajendra K · CTO, Small Business
[ faq ]

Questions teams ask before switching.

Code reviewers read the diff and guess. Qodex runs your test scenarios against the real running app on every pull request, then shows what actually broke, with the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. One reads, the other runs. Try both for a sprint and compare what each one catches.

Stop merging on faith.

Continuous testing that runs your scenarios against every PR and deploy, and shows you exactly what broke.

1 failed of 41 · GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing → 200, expected 403