Top Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring

|

Shreya Srivastava

|

Jul 29, 2024

Jul 29, 2024

Top Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring
Top Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring
Top Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring

Introduction

For many years, Postman has been a mainstay in the fields of API testing, development, and documentation. With its user-friendly interface, Postman makes it easy to create and execute API requests, automate tests, and manage APIs.

So, let's take a closer look at what makes Postman so popular and why some users are starting to explore alternatives.

Postman Overview:

Postman Overview


API testing:
  Postman makes it easy to send HTTP requests and check out the responses. Whether you need to use GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or other methods, Postman has you covered. 

Automation: You can write automated test scripts in JavaScript to validate your API responses, making your testing process more efficient and reliable.

Collaboration: Postman shines when it comes to teamwork. It supports collaboration so that multiple users can work together on API projects seamlessly.

For many years, Postman has been a mainstay in the fields of API testing, development, and documentation. With its user-friendly interface, Postman makes it easy to create and execute API requests, automate tests, and manage APIs.

So, let's take a closer look at what makes Postman so popular and why some users are starting to explore alternatives.

Postman Overview:

Postman Overview


API testing:
  Postman makes it easy to send HTTP requests and check out the responses. Whether you need to use GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or other methods, Postman has you covered. 

Automation: You can write automated test scripts in JavaScript to validate your API responses, making your testing process more efficient and reliable.

Collaboration: Postman shines when it comes to teamwork. It supports collaboration so that multiple users can work together on API projects seamlessly.

Why Consider Alternatives?

However, recent changes to its pricing model and the growing demand for more flexible, cost-effective solutions have led many to seek out Postman alternatives.

  • Postman has made significant changes to its pricing model, which have made it less accessible for teams, especially smaller ones or those with budget constraints.

  • The introduction of user-based pricing means that teams now have to pay for each user, which can quickly add up. This shift has prompted many users to explore free or more affordable alternatives.

  • While Postman offers a comprehensive set of features, some users find that it has become overly complex. The extensive features can lead to a cluttered interface, making it difficult for new users to navigate and utilize them effectively. Many developers prefer simpler tools that focus on core functionalities without the extra complexity.

  • Some users find Postman can be a bit resource-heavy and slow, especially when dealing with large collections of requests. They have also reported that it can slow down their systems, leading to frustration.

  • Although Postman has some automation features, they are not as extensive as those in other tools, and it is mostly meant for manual testing. It may not meet the needs of developers who rely significantly on automated testing.

  • Some users find Postman's interface to be overwhelming, particularly for beginners. The learning curve can be steep, and users may prefer alternatives that offer a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.

  • The developer community has been vocal about their experiences with Postman, often highlighting its shortcomings in forums and social media. This feedback has led many to investigate other options that may better meet their needs.

However, recent changes to its pricing model and the growing demand for more flexible, cost-effective solutions have led many to seek out Postman alternatives.

  • Postman has made significant changes to its pricing model, which have made it less accessible for teams, especially smaller ones or those with budget constraints.

  • The introduction of user-based pricing means that teams now have to pay for each user, which can quickly add up. This shift has prompted many users to explore free or more affordable alternatives.

  • While Postman offers a comprehensive set of features, some users find that it has become overly complex. The extensive features can lead to a cluttered interface, making it difficult for new users to navigate and utilize them effectively. Many developers prefer simpler tools that focus on core functionalities without the extra complexity.

  • Some users find Postman can be a bit resource-heavy and slow, especially when dealing with large collections of requests. They have also reported that it can slow down their systems, leading to frustration.

  • Although Postman has some automation features, they are not as extensive as those in other tools, and it is mostly meant for manual testing. It may not meet the needs of developers who rely significantly on automated testing.

  • Some users find Postman's interface to be overwhelming, particularly for beginners. The learning curve can be steep, and users may prefer alternatives that offer a more intuitive and user-friendly experience.

  • The developer community has been vocal about their experiences with Postman, often highlighting its shortcomings in forums and social media. This feedback has led many to investigate other options that may better meet their needs.

Ship bug-free software, 200% faster, in 20% testing budget. No coding required

Ship bug-free software, 200% faster, in 20% testing budget. No coding required

Ship bug-free software, 200% faster, in 20% testing budget. No coding required

Comparison of Postman Alternatives

Selecting the perfect tool for API development can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. To help you decide which alternative is best for you, here's a table comparing the key features and pricing of some top options:

Comparison of Postman Alternatives

Selecting the perfect tool for API development can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. To help you decide which alternative is best for you, here's a table comparing the key features and pricing of some top options:

Comparison of Postman Alternatives

Tools

  1. Qodex.ai

Qodex.ai - An AI-powered software test engineer

Qodex is a powerful AI-driven platform that revolutionizes software testing, enabling development teams to ship bug-free software 200% faster while reducing testing costs by 80%. By integrating an AI-powered software test engineer into your workflow, Qodex provides cutting-edge capabilities that deliver unparalleled results.

Key benefits of using Qodex include:

  • Continuous test coverage for APIs and UIs, with the AI agent maintaining exhaustive functional test cases and covering penetration, security, compliance, and load testing.

  • Contextual intelligence that personalizes testing for your specific product context.

  • Automatic updates to API collections and documentation, ensuring they remain current as your product evolves.

  • Seamless integration with your preferred tech stack, development tools, and workflows, as well as product documentation, code bases, and other resources.

  • A knowledge base built by the AI agent from product docs, code, and engineering systems.

  • Rapid test suite generation and maintenance, with the AI agent auto-updating test cases as needed.

  • Comprehensive test reports and release notes upon shipping.

Unmatched Efficiency

Qodex's human-like QA engineer operates at lightning speed, delivering a 90% reduction in bugs, 200% faster testing and deployment, and an 80% cut in QA costs. With its small onboarding effort and big returns, Qodex is loved by developers from startups to large enterprises looking to streamline their testing workflows and reduce inefficiencies.

Exceptional Value and Competitive Edge

While Qodex is not a free tool, its pricing model is designed to provide exceptional value for the features and benefits it offers. By investing in Qodex, development teams can transform their QA processes, deploy high-quality software faster, and gain a competitive edge in today's fast-paced digital landscape.

  1. Testfully

Testfully

One of the exciting Postman alternatives is Testfully. Testfully is an API testing tool that helps developers create, execute, and manage API requests easily. Think of it as a digital toolbox that lets you interact with APIs without needing to write complicated code.

It's designed to make your life easier, especially if you're working on projects that require a lot of API testing. Testfully sends HTTP requests to your API and checks the responses against user-defined acceptance criteria, making your API testing projects more manageable.

Key Features

  • API Support: Testfully handles a wide range of APIs, including RESTful, GraphQL, XML, SOAP, and YAML. This versatility makes it a suitable tool for any project, regardless of the API type involved.

  • Request Builder Options: The tool has a simple request builder that lets you create API requests quickly. You can choose the method (like GET or POST), add parameters, and see the results instantly.

  • Environment Variables: You can set up environment variables to manage different settings for your API requests. For example, if you're testing in a development environment and then in production, you can easily switch between them without changing your requests.

  • Folder Support: Organizing your requests is a breeze with folder support. You can group related requests together, making it easier to find what you need.

  • No-Code API Validation: You don't need to be a coding expert to validate your APIs. Testfully offers no-code validation options, making it accessible to everyone.

  • CLI Compatibility: Testfully can be used from the command line, which is great for developers who prefer working in a terminal.

  • JavaScript Scripting: For those who want to dive deeper, Testfully allows JavaScript scripting, enabling more complex testing scenarios.

  • Storage Options: You can save your requests and responses, so you don't have to recreate them every time.

  • SSO and Enterprise-Ready: If you're part of a larger organization, it supports Single Sign-On (SSO) and is built to handle enterprise needs.

Pros

  • Smooth Transition from Postman: If you're used to Postman, moving to Testfully is easy. The interface is user-friendly, making it simple to get started.

  • Simple Pricing Model: Testfully starts at just $5 per user per month, which is quite affordable compared to some other tools.

  • Multiple API Type Support: You can work with different API types all in one place, which saves time and effort.

  • Unique Features: The ability to create multi-step requests is a standout feature. For example, if you need to make a series of requests that depend on each other, you can set that up easily.

Con

  • Testfully can understand lots of app languages (like RESTful, GraphQL, and more), but it doesn't know all of them. For example, it can't understand two special languages called gRPC and WebSocket. So, if your app talks in one of those languages, Testfully won't be able to help you.

  • Another thing to know is that Testfully isn't free. You'll need to pay a small fee to use it. It starts at about $5 a month for each person using it. It's like buying a ticket to a fun amusement park—you can't just walk in for free.

  1. YaaK

YaaK

Yaak is a completely free alternative to Postman. Developers may easily create and manage API calls with this tool for testing APIs.

Here's what Yaak lets you do:

  • Talk Many App Languages: Yaak can understand different ways apps talk, like the popular RESTful and GraphQL, and even a more advanced language called gRPC (think secret writer codes!).

  • Organizing Your Chats: Just like having different notebooks for different subjects, Yaak lets you organize your chats with different apps in special folders. It's like having a color-coded filing cabinet to keep your app conversations tidy!

  • Basic Request Builder Options: Yaak has a simple request builder that allows you to create API requests easily. You can select the type of request you want to make (like GET or POST) and fill in the necessary details.

  • Cross-Platform: Yaak works on different operating systems, whether you're using Windows, Mac, or Linux. You don't have to worry about compatibility issues.

  • Drag and Drop Organization: You can easily move your requests around to keep things tidy. Just like rearranging books on a shelf, this feature helps you keep everything in order.

What Yaak Can't Do (Yet):
  • It doesn't support advanced authorization methods. This means that if your API requires complex security measures, you might run into some limitations.

  • Yaak doesn't allow you to write scripts for your requests. If you need to perform more complex testing scenarios, this could be a drawback.

  • Unlike some other tools, Yaak doesn't have tabs to switch between different requests easily. This might make it a bit less convenient if you're working with multiple requests at once.

The Good News? It's Free! (Yaak is completely free to use.)

  1. httpYac

httpYac

httpYac is an open-source tool for API testing that's designed to be lightweight and fast. Here's a simple breakdown of what it offers and how it works:

Pricing and Features Overview

  • Pricing: Free

  • Talk to Any App: This tool can understand different app languages like RESTful, GraphQL, SOAP, and even the super-fast gRPC. It's like having a universal translator for your apps!

  • Keep Your Secrets Safe: You can use different locks (authorization methods) to protect your app conversations, making sure only the right people can listen in.

  • Command Your Computer: You don't always need to click buttons. You can talk to this tool directly using simple commands, like a secret code.

  • Automate the Boring Stuff: Tired of repeating the same tasks? Write your own helper robots (scripts) to do the work for you, saving you time and energy.

  • Remember Everything: This tool has a super memory! You can save all your app conversations for later, so you don't have to start from scratch.

  • Work Smart, Not Hard: It can understand special codes (dotenv and IntelliJ files) that help you organize your app information, making your life easier.

Why httpYac Might Be Great for You?

  • It doesn't cost anything, and you can see and modify the code if you want.

  • It's quick to set up and use, so you don't waste time waiting around.

What Should You Know?

  • httpYac operates from the command line; thus, you must be comfortable with text-based commands rather than a graphical interface.

  • It's designed to work mainly with Visual Studio Code (VSCode), so it might not be as convenient if you use other code editors.

  1. Bruno

Bruno

Now you are trying to talk to different computers. Some speak English, others Spanish, and some use secret codes! Bruno is like a smart translator that helps you chat with all of them. Best of all, it's free!

What Can Bruno Do?

  • Bruno can talk to almost any computer language, from the simple ones to the really tricky ones. Whether it's RESTful, GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket, Bruno has you covered. You can build your messages to send, save your favorite chats, and even write your own shortcuts to speed things up. 

  • Bruno has a command-line tool you can use with NPM, perfect for adding to your automated testing routines. Plus, it works well with a popular tool called Visual Studio Code, so you can chat with computers right from there!

A Few Drawbacks

  • Bruno is like a home workstation; you can't take it everywhere like a mobile app. If you need to access your tests on multiple devices, it might not be the best fit.

  • Some users have mentioned small quirks in the design, like sticky notes that don't always stay put.

  • If you work in a team and need real-time sharing, Bruno's lack of cloud synchronization could be a downside.

  1. Insomnia

Insomnia

Insomnia is a popular, open-source API client that offers a simple and efficient alternative to Postman. Known for its easy-to-use interface, fast performance, and powerful plugin ecosystem, Insomnia is a great choice for developers looking for a streamlined approach to API testing and development.

Pricing and Plans 

  • Free plans provide access to key functionality, making them ideal for individual developers or small teams on a budget.

  • Paid plans start at $5 per month, offering extra functionality at a reasonable cost compared to other tools.

Key Features

  • Insomnia's primary strength lies in its clean and intuitive user interface. The tool is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing users to quickly perform common tasks without getting bogged down by unnecessary complexity.

  • It prioritizes speed and responsiveness, ensuring that users can work efficiently without experiencing lags or delays, even when dealing with large API projects.

  • As an open-source tool, Insomnia benefits from a thriving community that contributes to its plugin ecosystem. Users can extend the functionality of Insomnia by installing various plugins. Adding features such as authentication methods, code generation, and integration with other tools.

  • Insomnia supports a wide range of API types, including REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, and gRPC.

Limitations

Insomnia may lack some of the more advanced testing features found in Postman, such as comprehensive scripting capabilities and detailed reporting options.

It does not currently offer dedicated folder support for managing variables and authentication settings, which can make it more challenging to organize complex projects.

Use Cases

  • Individual developers or small teams working on API projects

  • Developers who prefer a lightweight and responsive interface

  • Users who require support for a variety of API types

  • Developers who value the ability to extend functionality through plugins

  1. Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is a powerful and accessible tool for API testing that stands out for its lightweight design and broad support for different API types, with its free access and paid plans starting at $19 per month.

Features 

  • Hoppscotch supports various API types, including RESTful, GraphQL, and WebSocket.

  • The platform features an intuitive request builder that makes it easy to create and customize API requests. 

  • Hoppscotch allows users to set up environment variables, which help manage different configurations for testing.

  • Users can easily import and export their API requests, making it simple to share work with team members or transfer projects between different tools.

  • It supports multiple authorization methods, ensuring that users can secure their API requests according to their needs.

  • For those who prefer command-line tools, Hoppscotch offers a command-line interface (CLI) option, allowing for seamless integration into automated workflows.

  • It also offers local, cloud, and on-premises storage options, giving users the flexibility to choose how they want to manage their data.

Pros

  • The user interface is clean and minimalistic, making it easy for users to navigate and perform tasks without feeling overwhelmed.

  • With support for various API types, developers can use Hoppscotch for a range of projects, reducing the need for multiple tools.

  • The ability to write scripts allows users to automate repetitive tasks, saving time and effort in the testing process.

Cons

  • Unlike some other tools, Hoppscotch does not offer a collection runner feature, which can limit the ability to run multiple requests in sequence.

  • While Hoppscotch allows for organization, it primarily relies on folders, which may not be as flexible as some users would prefer.

  • The platform has some restrictions on access control, which might be a concern for teams needing more granular permissions.

  1. Thunder Client

Thunder Client

Thunder Client is a lightweight API testing tool designed for users who appreciate a simple user interface and an excellent user experience without any complexity. It operates seamlessly offline and even supports documentation with markdown, making it a convenient choice for developers. This makes it an excellent choice for developers who want to focus on their tasks without getting bogged down by complicated features.

Pricing and Plans

Thunder Client offers a free version that provides access to its core features. For users who require additional functionality, paid plans start at a reasonable $5 per month per user, making it an affordable option for teams of various sizes.

Features 

  • Thunder Client supports various API types, including RESTful, GraphQL, and XML, allowing developers to work with different technologies within a single tool.

  • The extension provides a comprehensive request builder with scripting capabilities, enabling users to customize their API requests and automate testing tasks.

  • It offers support for environment variables, folders, and collections, making it easy to organize and manage API requests.

  • The extension includes a command-line interface (CLI) and a no-code GUI-based testing interface, providing flexibility for users who prefer different approaches to API testing.

  • All API request data is stored locally on the user's device, ensuring privacy and secure handling of sensitive information.

  • Users can import and export API requests, allowing for seamless collaboration and sharing of test cases.

Pros

  • Lightweight and fast performance

  • Seamless integration with Visual Studio Code

Cons

  • Limited to Visual Studio Code users only

  • Restrictions on the free plan

  1. Nightingale

Nightingale

Nightingale is a straightforward and free tool designed specifically for testing RESTful APIs. It offers a range of features that make it easy to create and manage API requests, making it a great option for developers looking for simplicity and efficiency.

Key Features

  • API Support: Nightingale focuses exclusively on RESTful APIs, allowing users to test and interact with these services effectively.

  • Request Builder with Chaining and Mocking: The request builder lets you create multi-step requests, which means you can chain requests together. 

    For example, if you need to get a user's details and then fetch their posts, you can set up these requests to follow one another seamlessly. Additionally, Nightingale allows you to mock responses, which is helpful for testing without needing a live server.

  • Environment Variables: This feature enables you to set up different environments for testing, such as development, staging, or production. You can easily switch between these environments without changing your requests manually.

  • Collection Support: Nightingale allows you to organize your API requests into collections, making it easier to manage and find them later. Think of it like a folder for your favorite recipes—you can group related requests together for quick access.

  • Import and Export Options: You can easily import existing requests or export your collections to share with others, which is especially useful for team collaboration.

  • Various Authorization Schemes: Nightingale supports different ways to secure your API requests, ensuring that you can test APIs that require authentication.

The Good and The Bad

  • Nightingale is completely free, making it accessible for developers at all levels.

  • The ability to chain requests together simplifies complex testing scenarios.

  • This feature allows you to simulate API responses without needing a backend, making testing faster and easier.

  • Nightingale only supports RESTful APIs, which may limit its use for those working with other types of APIs like GraphQL or SOAP.

  • The tool has some restrictions when it comes to collaborative features, which might be a drawback for larger teams.

  • Currently, Nightingale is only available for Windows users, which limits accessibility for those on other operating systems.

  1. HTTPie

HTTPie

As a developer, typing out long, complicated instructions for apps can be a real pain. HTTPie is like a walkie-talkie for your computer that lets you send messages (called requests) to apps quickly and easily. 

What Makes HTTPie So Awesome?

  • Free as a Bird: No need to break the bank here! HTTPie is completely free to use, perfect for programmers on a budget.

  • Lightning Fast: Time is precious, and HTTPie gets things done in a flash. It lets you send requests to apps super quickly, saving you valuable time.

  • Simple and Clear: No need for a codebreaking degree! HTTPie uses a straightforward interface that's easy to understand, even for beginners.

  • Works on Different Devices: Whether you're a PC, Mac, or Linux user, HTTPie has a desktop app for you. No matter what computer you use, you can chat with your apps.

  • Offline Champion: Even without the internet, HTTPie can store your messages (requests) for later. It's like having a walkie-talkie that works even in remote locations (your computer).

  • Building Blocks for Messages: Need to send complex messages? HTTPie lets you easily build them step by step, making even the trickiest app conversations a breeze.

  • Remembering Important Stuff: HTTPie remembers important things for each app you talk to, like passwords and settings. (But shhh, keep those passwords secret!)

  1. Qodex.ai

Qodex.ai - An AI-powered software test engineer

Qodex is a powerful AI-driven platform that revolutionizes software testing, enabling development teams to ship bug-free software 200% faster while reducing testing costs by 80%. By integrating an AI-powered software test engineer into your workflow, Qodex provides cutting-edge capabilities that deliver unparalleled results.

Key benefits of using Qodex include:

  • Continuous test coverage for APIs and UIs, with the AI agent maintaining exhaustive functional test cases and covering penetration, security, compliance, and load testing.

  • Contextual intelligence that personalizes testing for your specific product context.

  • Automatic updates to API collections and documentation, ensuring they remain current as your product evolves.

  • Seamless integration with your preferred tech stack, development tools, and workflows, as well as product documentation, code bases, and other resources.

  • A knowledge base built by the AI agent from product docs, code, and engineering systems.

  • Rapid test suite generation and maintenance, with the AI agent auto-updating test cases as needed.

  • Comprehensive test reports and release notes upon shipping.

Unmatched Efficiency

Qodex's human-like QA engineer operates at lightning speed, delivering a 90% reduction in bugs, 200% faster testing and deployment, and an 80% cut in QA costs. With its small onboarding effort and big returns, Qodex is loved by developers from startups to large enterprises looking to streamline their testing workflows and reduce inefficiencies.

Exceptional Value and Competitive Edge

While Qodex is not a free tool, its pricing model is designed to provide exceptional value for the features and benefits it offers. By investing in Qodex, development teams can transform their QA processes, deploy high-quality software faster, and gain a competitive edge in today's fast-paced digital landscape.

  1. Testfully

Testfully

One of the exciting Postman alternatives is Testfully. Testfully is an API testing tool that helps developers create, execute, and manage API requests easily. Think of it as a digital toolbox that lets you interact with APIs without needing to write complicated code.

It's designed to make your life easier, especially if you're working on projects that require a lot of API testing. Testfully sends HTTP requests to your API and checks the responses against user-defined acceptance criteria, making your API testing projects more manageable.

Key Features

  • API Support: Testfully handles a wide range of APIs, including RESTful, GraphQL, XML, SOAP, and YAML. This versatility makes it a suitable tool for any project, regardless of the API type involved.

  • Request Builder Options: The tool has a simple request builder that lets you create API requests quickly. You can choose the method (like GET or POST), add parameters, and see the results instantly.

  • Environment Variables: You can set up environment variables to manage different settings for your API requests. For example, if you're testing in a development environment and then in production, you can easily switch between them without changing your requests.

  • Folder Support: Organizing your requests is a breeze with folder support. You can group related requests together, making it easier to find what you need.

  • No-Code API Validation: You don't need to be a coding expert to validate your APIs. Testfully offers no-code validation options, making it accessible to everyone.

  • CLI Compatibility: Testfully can be used from the command line, which is great for developers who prefer working in a terminal.

  • JavaScript Scripting: For those who want to dive deeper, Testfully allows JavaScript scripting, enabling more complex testing scenarios.

  • Storage Options: You can save your requests and responses, so you don't have to recreate them every time.

  • SSO and Enterprise-Ready: If you're part of a larger organization, it supports Single Sign-On (SSO) and is built to handle enterprise needs.

Pros

  • Smooth Transition from Postman: If you're used to Postman, moving to Testfully is easy. The interface is user-friendly, making it simple to get started.

  • Simple Pricing Model: Testfully starts at just $5 per user per month, which is quite affordable compared to some other tools.

  • Multiple API Type Support: You can work with different API types all in one place, which saves time and effort.

  • Unique Features: The ability to create multi-step requests is a standout feature. For example, if you need to make a series of requests that depend on each other, you can set that up easily.

Con

  • Testfully can understand lots of app languages (like RESTful, GraphQL, and more), but it doesn't know all of them. For example, it can't understand two special languages called gRPC and WebSocket. So, if your app talks in one of those languages, Testfully won't be able to help you.

  • Another thing to know is that Testfully isn't free. You'll need to pay a small fee to use it. It starts at about $5 a month for each person using it. It's like buying a ticket to a fun amusement park—you can't just walk in for free.

  1. YaaK

YaaK

Yaak is a completely free alternative to Postman. Developers may easily create and manage API calls with this tool for testing APIs.

Here's what Yaak lets you do:

  • Talk Many App Languages: Yaak can understand different ways apps talk, like the popular RESTful and GraphQL, and even a more advanced language called gRPC (think secret writer codes!).

  • Organizing Your Chats: Just like having different notebooks for different subjects, Yaak lets you organize your chats with different apps in special folders. It's like having a color-coded filing cabinet to keep your app conversations tidy!

  • Basic Request Builder Options: Yaak has a simple request builder that allows you to create API requests easily. You can select the type of request you want to make (like GET or POST) and fill in the necessary details.

  • Cross-Platform: Yaak works on different operating systems, whether you're using Windows, Mac, or Linux. You don't have to worry about compatibility issues.

  • Drag and Drop Organization: You can easily move your requests around to keep things tidy. Just like rearranging books on a shelf, this feature helps you keep everything in order.

What Yaak Can't Do (Yet):
  • It doesn't support advanced authorization methods. This means that if your API requires complex security measures, you might run into some limitations.

  • Yaak doesn't allow you to write scripts for your requests. If you need to perform more complex testing scenarios, this could be a drawback.

  • Unlike some other tools, Yaak doesn't have tabs to switch between different requests easily. This might make it a bit less convenient if you're working with multiple requests at once.

The Good News? It's Free! (Yaak is completely free to use.)

  1. httpYac

httpYac

httpYac is an open-source tool for API testing that's designed to be lightweight and fast. Here's a simple breakdown of what it offers and how it works:

Pricing and Features Overview

  • Pricing: Free

  • Talk to Any App: This tool can understand different app languages like RESTful, GraphQL, SOAP, and even the super-fast gRPC. It's like having a universal translator for your apps!

  • Keep Your Secrets Safe: You can use different locks (authorization methods) to protect your app conversations, making sure only the right people can listen in.

  • Command Your Computer: You don't always need to click buttons. You can talk to this tool directly using simple commands, like a secret code.

  • Automate the Boring Stuff: Tired of repeating the same tasks? Write your own helper robots (scripts) to do the work for you, saving you time and energy.

  • Remember Everything: This tool has a super memory! You can save all your app conversations for later, so you don't have to start from scratch.

  • Work Smart, Not Hard: It can understand special codes (dotenv and IntelliJ files) that help you organize your app information, making your life easier.

Why httpYac Might Be Great for You?

  • It doesn't cost anything, and you can see and modify the code if you want.

  • It's quick to set up and use, so you don't waste time waiting around.

What Should You Know?

  • httpYac operates from the command line; thus, you must be comfortable with text-based commands rather than a graphical interface.

  • It's designed to work mainly with Visual Studio Code (VSCode), so it might not be as convenient if you use other code editors.

  1. Bruno

Bruno

Now you are trying to talk to different computers. Some speak English, others Spanish, and some use secret codes! Bruno is like a smart translator that helps you chat with all of them. Best of all, it's free!

What Can Bruno Do?

  • Bruno can talk to almost any computer language, from the simple ones to the really tricky ones. Whether it's RESTful, GraphQL, gRPC, or WebSocket, Bruno has you covered. You can build your messages to send, save your favorite chats, and even write your own shortcuts to speed things up. 

  • Bruno has a command-line tool you can use with NPM, perfect for adding to your automated testing routines. Plus, it works well with a popular tool called Visual Studio Code, so you can chat with computers right from there!

A Few Drawbacks

  • Bruno is like a home workstation; you can't take it everywhere like a mobile app. If you need to access your tests on multiple devices, it might not be the best fit.

  • Some users have mentioned small quirks in the design, like sticky notes that don't always stay put.

  • If you work in a team and need real-time sharing, Bruno's lack of cloud synchronization could be a downside.

  1. Insomnia

Insomnia

Insomnia is a popular, open-source API client that offers a simple and efficient alternative to Postman. Known for its easy-to-use interface, fast performance, and powerful plugin ecosystem, Insomnia is a great choice for developers looking for a streamlined approach to API testing and development.

Pricing and Plans 

  • Free plans provide access to key functionality, making them ideal for individual developers or small teams on a budget.

  • Paid plans start at $5 per month, offering extra functionality at a reasonable cost compared to other tools.

Key Features

  • Insomnia's primary strength lies in its clean and intuitive user interface. The tool is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing users to quickly perform common tasks without getting bogged down by unnecessary complexity.

  • It prioritizes speed and responsiveness, ensuring that users can work efficiently without experiencing lags or delays, even when dealing with large API projects.

  • As an open-source tool, Insomnia benefits from a thriving community that contributes to its plugin ecosystem. Users can extend the functionality of Insomnia by installing various plugins. Adding features such as authentication methods, code generation, and integration with other tools.

  • Insomnia supports a wide range of API types, including REST, GraphQL, WebSocket, and gRPC.

Limitations

Insomnia may lack some of the more advanced testing features found in Postman, such as comprehensive scripting capabilities and detailed reporting options.

It does not currently offer dedicated folder support for managing variables and authentication settings, which can make it more challenging to organize complex projects.

Use Cases

  • Individual developers or small teams working on API projects

  • Developers who prefer a lightweight and responsive interface

  • Users who require support for a variety of API types

  • Developers who value the ability to extend functionality through plugins

  1. Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is a powerful and accessible tool for API testing that stands out for its lightweight design and broad support for different API types, with its free access and paid plans starting at $19 per month.

Features 

  • Hoppscotch supports various API types, including RESTful, GraphQL, and WebSocket.

  • The platform features an intuitive request builder that makes it easy to create and customize API requests. 

  • Hoppscotch allows users to set up environment variables, which help manage different configurations for testing.

  • Users can easily import and export their API requests, making it simple to share work with team members or transfer projects between different tools.

  • It supports multiple authorization methods, ensuring that users can secure their API requests according to their needs.

  • For those who prefer command-line tools, Hoppscotch offers a command-line interface (CLI) option, allowing for seamless integration into automated workflows.

  • It also offers local, cloud, and on-premises storage options, giving users the flexibility to choose how they want to manage their data.

Pros

  • The user interface is clean and minimalistic, making it easy for users to navigate and perform tasks without feeling overwhelmed.

  • With support for various API types, developers can use Hoppscotch for a range of projects, reducing the need for multiple tools.

  • The ability to write scripts allows users to automate repetitive tasks, saving time and effort in the testing process.

Cons

  • Unlike some other tools, Hoppscotch does not offer a collection runner feature, which can limit the ability to run multiple requests in sequence.

  • While Hoppscotch allows for organization, it primarily relies on folders, which may not be as flexible as some users would prefer.

  • The platform has some restrictions on access control, which might be a concern for teams needing more granular permissions.

  1. Thunder Client

Thunder Client

Thunder Client is a lightweight API testing tool designed for users who appreciate a simple user interface and an excellent user experience without any complexity. It operates seamlessly offline and even supports documentation with markdown, making it a convenient choice for developers. This makes it an excellent choice for developers who want to focus on their tasks without getting bogged down by complicated features.

Pricing and Plans

Thunder Client offers a free version that provides access to its core features. For users who require additional functionality, paid plans start at a reasonable $5 per month per user, making it an affordable option for teams of various sizes.

Features 

  • Thunder Client supports various API types, including RESTful, GraphQL, and XML, allowing developers to work with different technologies within a single tool.

  • The extension provides a comprehensive request builder with scripting capabilities, enabling users to customize their API requests and automate testing tasks.

  • It offers support for environment variables, folders, and collections, making it easy to organize and manage API requests.

  • The extension includes a command-line interface (CLI) and a no-code GUI-based testing interface, providing flexibility for users who prefer different approaches to API testing.

  • All API request data is stored locally on the user's device, ensuring privacy and secure handling of sensitive information.

  • Users can import and export API requests, allowing for seamless collaboration and sharing of test cases.

Pros

  • Lightweight and fast performance

  • Seamless integration with Visual Studio Code

Cons

  • Limited to Visual Studio Code users only

  • Restrictions on the free plan

  1. Nightingale

Nightingale

Nightingale is a straightforward and free tool designed specifically for testing RESTful APIs. It offers a range of features that make it easy to create and manage API requests, making it a great option for developers looking for simplicity and efficiency.

Key Features

  • API Support: Nightingale focuses exclusively on RESTful APIs, allowing users to test and interact with these services effectively.

  • Request Builder with Chaining and Mocking: The request builder lets you create multi-step requests, which means you can chain requests together. 

    For example, if you need to get a user's details and then fetch their posts, you can set up these requests to follow one another seamlessly. Additionally, Nightingale allows you to mock responses, which is helpful for testing without needing a live server.

  • Environment Variables: This feature enables you to set up different environments for testing, such as development, staging, or production. You can easily switch between these environments without changing your requests manually.

  • Collection Support: Nightingale allows you to organize your API requests into collections, making it easier to manage and find them later. Think of it like a folder for your favorite recipes—you can group related requests together for quick access.

  • Import and Export Options: You can easily import existing requests or export your collections to share with others, which is especially useful for team collaboration.

  • Various Authorization Schemes: Nightingale supports different ways to secure your API requests, ensuring that you can test APIs that require authentication.

The Good and The Bad

  • Nightingale is completely free, making it accessible for developers at all levels.

  • The ability to chain requests together simplifies complex testing scenarios.

  • This feature allows you to simulate API responses without needing a backend, making testing faster and easier.

  • Nightingale only supports RESTful APIs, which may limit its use for those working with other types of APIs like GraphQL or SOAP.

  • The tool has some restrictions when it comes to collaborative features, which might be a drawback for larger teams.

  • Currently, Nightingale is only available for Windows users, which limits accessibility for those on other operating systems.

  1. HTTPie

HTTPie

As a developer, typing out long, complicated instructions for apps can be a real pain. HTTPie is like a walkie-talkie for your computer that lets you send messages (called requests) to apps quickly and easily. 

What Makes HTTPie So Awesome?

  • Free as a Bird: No need to break the bank here! HTTPie is completely free to use, perfect for programmers on a budget.

  • Lightning Fast: Time is precious, and HTTPie gets things done in a flash. It lets you send requests to apps super quickly, saving you valuable time.

  • Simple and Clear: No need for a codebreaking degree! HTTPie uses a straightforward interface that's easy to understand, even for beginners.

  • Works on Different Devices: Whether you're a PC, Mac, or Linux user, HTTPie has a desktop app for you. No matter what computer you use, you can chat with your apps.

  • Offline Champion: Even without the internet, HTTPie can store your messages (requests) for later. It's like having a walkie-talkie that works even in remote locations (your computer).

  • Building Blocks for Messages: Need to send complex messages? HTTPie lets you easily build them step by step, making even the trickiest app conversations a breeze.

  • Remembering Important Stuff: HTTPie remembers important things for each app you talk to, like passwords and settings. (But shhh, keep those passwords secret!)

Are There Any Catches?

While HTTPie is fantastic, there are a few things to keep in mind:

Web App Needs a Bridge: If you use the web version of HTTPie, it sends your messages through their servers first. It's like using a walkie-talkie that needs to go through a relay station sometimes.

Limited Fancy Security Codes: Some apps use extra strong security measures. HTTPie can handle most security features but not all the advanced ones.

No Filing Cabinet for Messages: HTTPie doesn't have a fancy way to organize your conversations with different apps. It's more like keeping all your walkie-talkie messages in a single pile.

Conclusion

While Postman is a powerful tool for API testing and development, the evolving landscape of alternatives provides a range of options to meet diverse needs and preferences. Whether you seek a lightweight solution, an open-source alternative, or advanced automation features, there’s a tool out there for you.

Explore options like Qodex to find the perfect fit for your API testing and monitoring requirements, ensuring your development process stays efficient and effective. Start exploring today and elevate your API testing experience!

While HTTPie is fantastic, there are a few things to keep in mind:

Web App Needs a Bridge: If you use the web version of HTTPie, it sends your messages through their servers first. It's like using a walkie-talkie that needs to go through a relay station sometimes.

Limited Fancy Security Codes: Some apps use extra strong security measures. HTTPie can handle most security features but not all the advanced ones.

No Filing Cabinet for Messages: HTTPie doesn't have a fancy way to organize your conversations with different apps. It's more like keeping all your walkie-talkie messages in a single pile.

Conclusion

While Postman is a powerful tool for API testing and development, the evolving landscape of alternatives provides a range of options to meet diverse needs and preferences. Whether you seek a lightweight solution, an open-source alternative, or advanced automation features, there’s a tool out there for you.

Explore options like Qodex to find the perfect fit for your API testing and monitoring requirements, ensuring your development process stays efficient and effective. Start exploring today and elevate your API testing experience!

FAQs

1. Why do people seek alternatives to Postman?

Many users seek alternatives due to Postman's recent pricing changes, which have made it less accessible for teams. Additionally, some users find the interface complex or overwhelming, prompting them to explore simpler or more cost-effective options.

2. Is Postman open source?

No, Postman is not an open-source tool. It offers a free tier, but advanced features and team collaboration require a paid subscription.

3. What are the costs associated with using Postman?

Postman offers a free plan with limited features. Paid plans start at $12 per user per month, depending on the level of functionality required.

4. Which Postman alternatives are open source?

Some open-source alternatives include Insomnia, Hoppscotch, and Bruno, which provide similar functionalities to Postman.

5. What are some lightweight alternatives to Postman?

Lightweight alternatives include Hoppscotch and HTTPie, both of which offer fast performance and minimalistic interfaces.

6. Do Postman alternatives support different API types?

Yes, many alternatives support various API types, including REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and gRPC, allowing developers to choose tools that fit their specific needs.

7. Can I collaborate with my team using Postman alternatives?

Several Postman alternatives offer collaboration features, allowing teams to work together on API projects. Tools like Testfully and Insomnia provide team management and access control options.

8. What are the scripting capabilities of Postman alternatives?

Most alternatives, such as Testfully and Insomnia, offer scripting capabilities using JavaScript, enabling users to modify requests, access responses, and set variables.

9. Which Postman alternatives offer API testing?

All the alternatives discussed in this article provide API testing capabilities with varying levels of automation and support for different API types.

10. Which Postman alternatives offer CLI support?

Alternatives like httpYac and HTTPie offer command-line interface (CLI) support, making them suitable for integration into CI/CD pipelines.

11. Are there any free Postman alternatives?

Yes, several alternatives are available for free, including Yaak, httpYac, and Nightingale, providing basic API testing functionalities without any cost.

12. Which Postman alternatives have desktop applications?

Bruno and Insomnia offer desktop applications, allowing users to test APIs without relying on a web interface.

13. Are there any VSCode extension Postman alternatives?

Thunder Client is a VSCode extension that provides API testing capabilities directly within the Visual Studio Code environment.

14. Which Postman alternatives support importing Postman collections?

Tools like Testfully and Insomnia allow users to import Postman collections, making it easier to transition from Postman to these alternatives.

OUTLINE

Introduction

1. Postman as a widely-used API client and testing tool

2. Reasons for seeking Postman alternatives

Comparison of Postman Alternatives

1. Table of features and availability in different tools

2. Purpose: Help in making better decisions faster

Testfully

1. Website: testfully.io

2. Pricing: From $5/user a month

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, XML, Soap, Yaml); Request builder options; Environment variables; Folder support; Import and Export options; CLI compatibility; No-code API validation and JavaScript scripting; Storage options; SSO and enterprise-ready

4. Pros: Smooth transition from Postman; Simple pricing model; Multiple API type support; Unique features like multi-step requests

5. Cons: No gRPC or WebSocket support; No free plan

Yaak

1. Website: yaak.app

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, gRPC); Organizational folders; Basic request builder options; Environment variables

4. Pros: Cross-platform; Drag and drop organization

5. Cons: Limited authorization support; No scripting; Lacks request switching tabs

httpYac

1. Website: httpyac.github.io

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Soap, gRPC); Various authorization options; CLI available; JavaScript scripting; Local storage; dotenv and intelliJ files support

4. Pros: Free and open-source; Lightweight and fast

5. Cons: Command-line tool; Limited to VSCode users

Bruno

1. Website: usebruno.com

2. Pricing: Free and Open Source (Golden Edition $12/year)

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket in Golden edition); Comprehensive request builder; Environment variables; Import and Export options; JavaScript scripting; CLI tool via NPM; API testing capabilities; Local storage

4. Pros: Free and open-source; Supports execution within Visual Studio Code

5. Cons: Desktop app only; Some UX issues; No cloud sync

Insomnia

1. Website: insomnia.rest

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $5/month/user

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Web Socket, gRPC); Request builder options; Environment variables; Import and Export options; All standard authorization schemes; Inso CLI

4. Pros: Simple and easy-to-use UI; Fast and responsive; Open-source plugin ecosystem

5. Cons: No testing for standard requests; No folder support for variables/auth

Hoppscotch

1. Website: hoppscotch.com

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $19/month

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Web Socket); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Import and Export options; Various authorization schemes; CLI available; Basic scripting capabilities; Local, Cloud, and On-prem storage

4. Pros: Lightweight UI; Wide API type support; Scripting capabilities

5. Cons: Organizational folders only; No collection runner; Limited access control

Thunder Client

1. Website: thunderclient.com

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $5/month/user

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, XML); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Folder and collection support; Import and Export options; CLI available; No-code GUI API testing; Local storage

4. Pros: Lightweight and fast; VSCode extension

5. Cons: VSCode-only extension; Limits on free plan

Nightingale

1. Website: nightingale.rest

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful API only); Request builder with chaining and mocking; Environment variables; Collection support; Import and Export options; Various authorization schemes

4. Pros: Free; Multi-step requests; Mock servers

5. Cons: REST only; Limited team collaboration; Windows only

HTTPie

1. Website: httpie.io

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Powerful CLI; Cloud and offline storage; Import options

4. Pros: Free; Fast and intuitive; Desktop app for multiple OS

5. Cons: Web app sends requests via HTTPie servers; Limited advanced auth support; No request organization

FAQs

1. Why do people seek alternatives to Postman?

2. Is Postman open source?

3. What are the costs associated with using Postman?

4. Which Postman alternatives are open source?

5. What are some lightweight alternatives to Postman?

6. Do Postman alternatives support different API types?

7. Can I collaborate with my team using Postman alternatives?

8. What are the scripting capabilities of Postman alternatives?

9. Which Postman alternatives offer API testing?

10. Which Postman alternatives offer CLI support?

11. Are there any free Postman alternatives?

12. Which Postman alternatives have desktop applications?

13. Are there any VSCode extension Postman alternatives?

14. Which Postman alternatives support importing Postman collections?

1. Why do people seek alternatives to Postman?

Many users seek alternatives due to Postman's recent pricing changes, which have made it less accessible for teams. Additionally, some users find the interface complex or overwhelming, prompting them to explore simpler or more cost-effective options.

2. Is Postman open source?

No, Postman is not an open-source tool. It offers a free tier, but advanced features and team collaboration require a paid subscription.

3. What are the costs associated with using Postman?

Postman offers a free plan with limited features. Paid plans start at $12 per user per month, depending on the level of functionality required.

4. Which Postman alternatives are open source?

Some open-source alternatives include Insomnia, Hoppscotch, and Bruno, which provide similar functionalities to Postman.

5. What are some lightweight alternatives to Postman?

Lightweight alternatives include Hoppscotch and HTTPie, both of which offer fast performance and minimalistic interfaces.

6. Do Postman alternatives support different API types?

Yes, many alternatives support various API types, including REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and gRPC, allowing developers to choose tools that fit their specific needs.

7. Can I collaborate with my team using Postman alternatives?

Several Postman alternatives offer collaboration features, allowing teams to work together on API projects. Tools like Testfully and Insomnia provide team management and access control options.

8. What are the scripting capabilities of Postman alternatives?

Most alternatives, such as Testfully and Insomnia, offer scripting capabilities using JavaScript, enabling users to modify requests, access responses, and set variables.

9. Which Postman alternatives offer API testing?

All the alternatives discussed in this article provide API testing capabilities with varying levels of automation and support for different API types.

10. Which Postman alternatives offer CLI support?

Alternatives like httpYac and HTTPie offer command-line interface (CLI) support, making them suitable for integration into CI/CD pipelines.

11. Are there any free Postman alternatives?

Yes, several alternatives are available for free, including Yaak, httpYac, and Nightingale, providing basic API testing functionalities without any cost.

12. Which Postman alternatives have desktop applications?

Bruno and Insomnia offer desktop applications, allowing users to test APIs without relying on a web interface.

13. Are there any VSCode extension Postman alternatives?

Thunder Client is a VSCode extension that provides API testing capabilities directly within the Visual Studio Code environment.

14. Which Postman alternatives support importing Postman collections?

Tools like Testfully and Insomnia allow users to import Postman collections, making it easier to transition from Postman to these alternatives.

OUTLINE

Introduction

1. Postman as a widely-used API client and testing tool

2. Reasons for seeking Postman alternatives

Comparison of Postman Alternatives

1. Table of features and availability in different tools

2. Purpose: Help in making better decisions faster

Testfully

1. Website: testfully.io

2. Pricing: From $5/user a month

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, XML, Soap, Yaml); Request builder options; Environment variables; Folder support; Import and Export options; CLI compatibility; No-code API validation and JavaScript scripting; Storage options; SSO and enterprise-ready

4. Pros: Smooth transition from Postman; Simple pricing model; Multiple API type support; Unique features like multi-step requests

5. Cons: No gRPC or WebSocket support; No free plan

Yaak

1. Website: yaak.app

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, gRPC); Organizational folders; Basic request builder options; Environment variables

4. Pros: Cross-platform; Drag and drop organization

5. Cons: Limited authorization support; No scripting; Lacks request switching tabs

httpYac

1. Website: httpyac.github.io

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Soap, gRPC); Various authorization options; CLI available; JavaScript scripting; Local storage; dotenv and intelliJ files support

4. Pros: Free and open-source; Lightweight and fast

5. Cons: Command-line tool; Limited to VSCode users

Bruno

1. Website: usebruno.com

2. Pricing: Free and Open Source (Golden Edition $12/year)

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket in Golden edition); Comprehensive request builder; Environment variables; Import and Export options; JavaScript scripting; CLI tool via NPM; API testing capabilities; Local storage

4. Pros: Free and open-source; Supports execution within Visual Studio Code

5. Cons: Desktop app only; Some UX issues; No cloud sync

Insomnia

1. Website: insomnia.rest

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $5/month/user

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Web Socket, gRPC); Request builder options; Environment variables; Import and Export options; All standard authorization schemes; Inso CLI

4. Pros: Simple and easy-to-use UI; Fast and responsive; Open-source plugin ecosystem

5. Cons: No testing for standard requests; No folder support for variables/auth

Hoppscotch

1. Website: hoppscotch.com

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $19/month

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, Web Socket); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Import and Export options; Various authorization schemes; CLI available; Basic scripting capabilities; Local, Cloud, and On-prem storage

4. Pros: Lightweight UI; Wide API type support; Scripting capabilities

5. Cons: Organizational folders only; No collection runner; Limited access control

Thunder Client

1. Website: thunderclient.com

2. Pricing: Free, Paid plans start at $5/month/user

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL, XML); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Folder and collection support; Import and Export options; CLI available; No-code GUI API testing; Local storage

4. Pros: Lightweight and fast; VSCode extension

5. Cons: VSCode-only extension; Limits on free plan

Nightingale

1. Website: nightingale.rest

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful API only); Request builder with chaining and mocking; Environment variables; Collection support; Import and Export options; Various authorization schemes

4. Pros: Free; Multi-step requests; Mock servers

5. Cons: REST only; Limited team collaboration; Windows only

HTTPie

1. Website: httpie.io

2. Pricing: Free

3. Features: API support (Restful, GraphQL); Request builder with scripting; Environment variables; Powerful CLI; Cloud and offline storage; Import options

4. Pros: Free; Fast and intuitive; Desktop app for multiple OS

5. Cons: Web app sends requests via HTTPie servers; Limited advanced auth support; No request organization

FAQs

1. Why do people seek alternatives to Postman?

2. Is Postman open source?

3. What are the costs associated with using Postman?

4. Which Postman alternatives are open source?

5. What are some lightweight alternatives to Postman?

6. Do Postman alternatives support different API types?

7. Can I collaborate with my team using Postman alternatives?

8. What are the scripting capabilities of Postman alternatives?

9. Which Postman alternatives offer API testing?

10. Which Postman alternatives offer CLI support?

11. Are there any free Postman alternatives?

12. Which Postman alternatives have desktop applications?

13. Are there any VSCode extension Postman alternatives?

14. Which Postman alternatives support importing Postman collections?

Get opensource free alternative of postman. Free upto 100 team members!

Get opensource free alternative of postman. Free upto 100 team members!

Get opensource free alternative of postman. Free upto 100 team members!

FAQs

Why should you choose Qodex.ai?

Why should you choose Qodex.ai?

Why should you choose Qodex.ai?

Ship bug-free software,
200% faster, in 20% testing budget

Remommended posts

qodex ai footer

Hire our AI Software Test Engineer

Experience the future of automation software testing.

qodex ai footer

Hire our AI Software Test Engineer

Experience the future of automation software testing.

qodex ai footer

Hire our AI Software Test Engineer

Experience the future of automation software testing.