Continuous testing
Your pipeline is continuous. Your testing should be too.
Qodex runs your test scenarios against every pull request and deploy, on the real running app, and shows exactly what broke.
Rated 4.9 / 5 on G2 · works in GitHub, the CLI, and Slack
Why now
PR submissions are through the roof. Has testing kept up?
LLMs have reset what was possible from a single engineer. For teams, engineering leaders have seen PRs pile up faster every week. Testing hasn't caught up, and QA and test suites everywhere have been left picking up the pieces as best they can.
longer PR review time under high AI adoption
increase in the incidents-to-PR ratio
more PRs merge without any review
Source: Faros AI Engineering Report 2026
Passing tests isn't working software.
Today's options
Two answers, neither one runs your code.
PR reviewers that read the diff and guess.
They pattern-match the change and tell you what might be wrong. Confident, fast, and they never ran your code, so the verification that matters is still left to you.
Testing tools that run once and forget.
They execute, but off to the side, on a schedule, disconnected from the code. Each run is an island, the scenarios go stale, and the coverage map is theater.
One reads but never runs. The other runs but doesn't learn. Neither makes testing continuous.
What Qodex does instead
- Your test scenariosOne place, owned by the team
- Run on the real appEvery pull request and deploy
- Proof of what brokeFailing request, response, screenshot
- Scenarios stay currentCoverage compounds instead of resetting
The last step feeds the first, so testing learns instead of resetting every sprint.
How it works
From scattered test knowledge to continuous testing.
Click through the jobs Qodex takes off the team.
Connect spreadsheets, OpenAPI specs, Postman collections, existing tests, and product docs. Qodex imports them into one place to start from.
Import from a source
Test scenarios
Automate the layer that governs your tests.
That layer is your test scenarios: the plain-language record of how the product should behave. Qodex keeps it accurate and runs it for you, so coverage moves at the speed you ship.
A test scenario is the durable statement of what should be true. Teams already think in scenarios; today they keep them by hand in a spreadsheet or scattered across point tools, disconnected from the code. Qodex makes them first-class and automatic: one place to manage scenarios, generate them to close coverage gaps, and adapt them as the product changes.
Your test scenarios don't belong in a spreadsheet. They belong where your code lives.
Test scenarios
Imported · Postman · 12m agoAPIHighPassing
Generated · 1h agoAPICriticalFailing
Imported · Sheets · 3h agoAPIMediumPassing
Generated · 5h agoUIHighPassing
Team knowledge · 6h agoAPIHighNeeds review
Consolidate and expand
Bring every scenario into one place, then close the gaps.
Your scenarios are scattered across spreadsheets, Postman, old test files, and people's heads. Qodex pulls them into one place and keeps them current.
Import what you already have, and Qodex turns it into scenarios it maintains as the code changes. Then ask in chat where you're thin, and it proposes the scenarios you're missing, so coverage grows on purpose instead of by accident.
Qodex found 3 coverage gaps
- Expired card retries, then succeeds on the second attempt+ Add
- Checkout blocks cleanly when inventory hits zero mid-session+ Add
- Applied coupon survives a failed payment retry+ Add
Proof, not guesses
Not “this might break.” This broke. Here's the proof.
When a pull request opens, a CLI or local run fires, or you run it inside Qodex, your scenarios run against the real software, and you get back what actually broke.
Qodex doesn't read the diff and infer. It runs the code against the preview build and posts the result inline, with the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. Proof, not inference. A human still decides what merges.
Admin can read another org’s billing
Scenario
Admin cannot access tenant billing across orgs
Reproduction
- Sign in as Org A admin
- Request GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing
- Expect 403 Forbidden
Request
GET /v1/orgs/org_8842/billing Authorization: Bearer <orgA_admin>
Response
200 OK
{ "org_id": "org_8842", "plan": "scale", "mrr": 41200 }Screenshot
Billing detail rendered for an org the user does not belong to.
Your system of record
How your software should work, out of people's heads and into one living record.
Because your scenarios are maintained and proven continuously, they become the shared, authoritative picture of how your software is supposed to behave.
Today that knowledge lives in senior engineers' heads and in spreadsheets that rot the moment the code changes, and it walks out the door when they do. Qodex keeps it in one place, owned by the team, evolving as the product does, so coverage builds instead of resetting every sprint.
Scattered today
One living record
One platform
Review, testing, and security on one record.
Once Qodex runs the code on every PR, the line between review and testing stops making sense. The same engine that proves what broke in review runs your API and UI scenarios, probes them in hostile mode for OWASP-aligned security filed against the PR that introduced the issue, and shows leaders where velocity is actually going. One platform, fewer tools.
The PR check and inline comment teams already read, now backed by a real run.
For your team
Built for the people who own quality.
Different teams use the same test scenarios at different moments.
Know whether this PR actually broke a scenario before you merge.
A real run on the diff, with the failing request and response inline in review.
Proof
Teams already trust Qodex with their testing.
“We’re no longer chasing outdated test scripts after every new release.”
“We achieved 100% API test coverage without hiring a huge QA team.”
“Our shipment time from staging to production reduced to 2 days instead of 5.”
FAQ
Questions teams ask before switching.
Code reviewers read the diff and guess. Qodex runs your test scenarios against the real running app on every pull request, then shows what actually broke, with the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. One reads, the other runs. Try both for a sprint and compare what each one catches.
Most tools run a suite off to the side, on a schedule, and forget it between runs. Qodex keeps your scenarios in one place, runs them on every pull request and deploy, and updates them as the product changes, so coverage compounds instead of going stale.
No. Scenarios run as deterministic Playwright and HTTP checks that cost milliseconds, not tokens. Runs have no LLM cost, so testing every pull request stays cheap.
Every scenario is readable and editable by your team, and every finding is reproducible from the exact request and response. Qodex proposes, a human decides what merges, and nothing changes your code automatically.
Import them. Qodex pulls in what you already have, turns it into scenarios it maintains as the code changes, and you can ask it in chat to close the coverage gaps you are missing.
No. Qodex surfaces what broke and proposes coverage. People decide what merges and ships. No auto-merge, no auto-deploy, no silent changes to your code.
No. Qodex shifts OWASP-aligned, hostile-mode checks left into the pull request that introduced the issue, with code context. It reduces how much you lean on the quarterly pentest, but it does not replace a regulated audit.
Install the GitHub app, import a few scenarios, and the next pull request runs them against the change. You see real findings on day one, not after a long rollout.
Stop merging on faith.
Continuous testing that runs your scenarios against every PR and deploy, and shows what actually broke.