AI writes your code. Qodex makes sure it works.

Real API, UI, and security tests on every pull request.

  • AI writes and maintains the tests
  • OWASP security probes on every PR
  • Runs on your real app, not diff guesswork

Install the GitHub app, results on your next PR.

G2 Best Software 2026, Fastest Growing4.9 / 5 from 60 reviews on G2
harden tenant billing access#1473
Opendanielle-w wants to merge 6 commits into main from fix/tenant-billing-isolation+318-9414 files
ConversationCommits 6Checks 3Files changed 14
Qodexbotreviewed and requested changescommented just nowChanges requested
checkout-api/billing.tsline 84
-const billing = await db.billing.find(orgId)
+const billing = await db.billing.find({ orgId, callerOrgId })

Tenant isolation is broken here. An Org A admin can read another org’s billing. Scope the query to the caller’s org.

Qodexbotflagged a vulnerabilitycommented just now
CriticalBroken object-level authorization (BOLA)

GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing returns 200 for an Org A admin (expected 403). Cross-tenant billing is exposed.

status 200, expected 403CVSS 8.6OWASP API1:2023
Qodexbotran the test suitecommented just now
1 of 41 scenarios failed

Scenario “Admin cannot access tenant billing across orgs” failed: GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing returned 200 instead of 403.

1 failed40 passedrun_5f1c · 11.4s
Qodex / code reviewchanges requested
Qodex / security1 critical
Qodex / tests1 failed of 41
Merge pull requestReview required · merging is blocked
trusted by teams shipping at AI speed
[ why now ]

PR volume is through the roof. Testing hasn't kept up.

LLMs reset what one engineer can ship. PRs pile up faster every week, and QA, code review, and stale test suites are left picking up the pieces.

~5x
longer PR review time under high AI adoption
3x+
increase in the incidents-to-PR ratio
+31%
more PRs merge without any review

Passing tests isn't the same as working software.

[ today's options ]

Two answers, neither one runs your code.

reads · never runs

PR reviewers that read the diff and guess.

They pattern-match the change and tell you what might be wrong. Confident, fast, and they never ran your code, so the verification that matters is still on you.

runs · never learns

Testing tools that run once and forget.

They execute, but off to the side, on a schedule, disconnected from the code. Each run is an island, the scenarios go stale, and the coverage map is theater.

what qodex does instead↻ continuous loop
01
Your test scenarios
One place, owned by the team.
02
Run on the real app
Every pull request and deploy.
03
Proof of what broke
Failing request, response, screenshot.
04
Scenarios stay current
Coverage compounds, never resets.
[ how it works ]

From scattered test knowledge to continuous testing.

The jobs Qodex takes off the team, end to end.

import scenarios
Import from a source
Pull in spreadsheets, OpenAPI specs, Postman collections, existing tests, and product docs, into one place to start from.
Google Sheets
connected
Postman
connected
OpenAPI spec
connected
Product docs
connect
importing · postman132 / 168
[ system of record ]

Out of people's heads, into one living record.

Test knowledge lives in senior engineers' heads, in spreadsheets that rot the moment code changes, and walks out the door when they do.

Qodex keeps your scenarios in one place, owned by the team and proven continuously: the authoritative picture of how your software should behave.

scattered today
Google Sheets
Slack threads
Postman
Senior engineers
Qodex
one living record
Scenarios
Test runs
Findings
PR comments
[ test scenarios ]

Automate the layer that governs your tests.

Your scenarios are the plain-language record of how the product should behave. Qodex keeps them accurate and runs them for you, so coverage moves at the speed you ship.

They don't belong in a spreadsheet. They belong where your code lives.

scenarios · 42
ScenarioSevStatus
Expired card is declined cleanlyHIGHPASS
Admin can't read another org's billingCRITFAIL
Invite link expires after seven daysMEDPASS
Checkout preserves cart after auth refreshHIGHPASS
Password reset rejects re-used tokensHIGHREVIEW
[ proof, not guesses ]

Not "this might break." This broke. Here's the proof.

When a PR opens, a CLI or local run fires, or you run it inside Qodex, your scenarios run against the real software and you get back what actually broke.

Qodex posts the result inline: the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. A human still decides what merges.

finding F-2048
OPENFIXEDFALSE+WON'T FIX

Admin can read another org's billing

Reproduction
Sign in as Org A admin
GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing
Expect 403 Forbidden
Screenshot
Billing · Org #8842
MRR $41,200
Rendered for an org the user does not belong to.
pull/1473 · run_5f1c · detected 0.8s into run
[ for your team ]

Built for the people who own quality.

Know whether this PR actually broke a scenario before you merge.

A real run on the diff, with the failing request and response inline in review. No more reading the change and hoping.

github.com/acme/checkout · pull/1473
#1473harden tenant billing access
fix/tenant-billing-isolation → main
Qodex · continuous testing1 failed of 41
Qodex bot commented

Scenario "Admin can't read another org's billing" failed: GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing returned 200, expected 403.

Caught before merge · request, response & screenshot attached
Request
GET /v1/orgs/org_8842/billing
Authorization: Bearer <org_A_admin>
Response · 200 OK
{
  "org_id": "org_8842",
  "plan": "scale",
  "mrr": 41200
}
run_5f1c · main @ 9a2e1b · 0.8s
[ faq ]

Questions teams ask before switching.

Code reviewers read the diff and guess. Qodex runs your test scenarios against the real running app on every pull request, then shows what actually broke, with the failing request, the response, and a screenshot. One reads, the other runs. Try both for a sprint and compare what each one catches.

Stop merging on faith.

Continuous testing that runs your scenarios against every PR and deploy, and shows you exactly what broke.

1 failed of 41 · GET /v1/orgs/{orgB}/billing → 200, expected 403